Hora, M., & Ferrare, J.. (2014). The Teaching Dimensions Observation Protocol (TDOP) 2.0. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

Horii, C. V., & Springboard, M. (2022). What teaching looks like: Higher education through photographs: Elon University Center for Engaged Learning.

Kohut, G. F., Burnap, C., & Yon, M. G. (2007). Peer observation of teaching: Perceptions of the observer and the observed. College Teaching, 55(1), 19-25.

Lang, J. M. (2019). We don’t trust course evaluations, but are peer observations of teaching much better? Chronicle of Higher Education.

Smith, M.K., Jones F. H., Gilbert, S. L., & Wieman, C. E., (2013). The Classroom Observation Protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices. CBE-Life Sciences Education, Vol 12(4), pp. 618-627.

University of Massachusetts Teaching Evaluation Template (TEval Project, 2020): Dimensions of Teaching

Guidelines for Implementing Peer Review of Online and Hybrid Teaching

Here are three guides for OSU faculty teaching hybrid or fully online courses who need a peer review of teaching in these modalities. The guides are designed to help instructors prepare for the peer review and to guide peer reviewers.

Greenough, L. (n.d.). New Tool for Faculty Peer Review of Canvas Discussions. Oregon State University Center for Teaching and Learning Blog